SC notice to NTA on NEET re-examination, says no to postponement of counselling process

SC notice to NTA on NEET re-examination, says no to postponement of counselling process

A Vacation Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and S.V. Bhatti refused to postpone or stay the counselling process scheduled to begin from July 6.

The Supreme Court on June 21 asked the National Testing Agency (NTA) to respond to pleas for conducting a fresh National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) 2024 after allegations of question paper leaks and other irregularities have dented the sanctity of the national-level exams for undergraduate medical admissions which saw 24 lakh aspirants appear across the country.

A Vacation Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and S.V. Bhatti however refused to postpone or stay the counselling process scheduled to begin from July 6.

NEET row: Supreme Court to examine pleas for independent panel inquirySupreme Court says any negligence in conduct of NEET should be dealt with thoroughly

“Counselling is a process. It only commences from July 6. It will continue for a week. Meanwhile, the applicants have many options…to amend/modify…” Justice Bhatti told a counsel for a petitioner.

The court for the second consecutive week, issued notice to pleas seeking a CBI investigation into the allegations of irregularities.

A petitioner urged the court to bring the NEET exam under its direct monitoring.

“We are seeking re-conduct of the exam as NTA has withheld material information,” a lawyer argued.

On Thursday, another set of petitioners had questioned the method used by the NTA to arrive at the figure of 1,563 candidates for retest scheduled on June 23.

We feel exploited, say angry students on cancellation of UGC-NET and irregularities in NEETGovernment to set up panel to suggest steps to improve NTA’s work

“How did the NTA arrive at the figure of 1563… What criteria was followed? The list of these students has not been made public on the website or anywhere…Absolutely arbitrary,” the petitioners submitted.

One of the petitioners had challenged the validity of holding the re-test itself, arguing that the law has only prescribed for one NEET a year.

Thursday had also seen the apex court decide to examine pleas questioning the Centre’s appointment of NTA chairman Prof. Pradeep Kumar Joshi as the head of the high-powered committee which had recommended re-test for 1,563 NEET-UG candidates who were given grace marks.

Petitions had sought an independent panel constituted by the Supreme Court to enquire into the NEET imbroglio.

In a recent hearing, the apex court had made it clear that it did not want “even .001% negligence” on the part of anyone in the conduct of the NEET-UG 2024 to be spared.

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Telegram
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

SEE ALL
PRINT

medical colleges

/
higher education

/
entrance examination

/
court administration

/
medicine (education)

Related posts

Bengal floods: Mamata writes to Modi, threatens to sever ties with Damodar Valley Corpn

India’s third home-built 700 MWe nuclear reactor achieves criticality

Banks must use UPI to create more digital opportunities to empower millions: FM Sitharaman